Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate software tests from heterogeneous artifacts, but semantic redundancy and stochastic output variability complicate reliable pre-execution refinement. This paper presents STLC Manager, an LLM-supported framework that transforms requirements, UML/XML models, and source code into structured test scenarios and test cases and supports Serial, Bulk, and Parallel strategies for semantic redundancy reduction. Validation combines archived cross-model evidence with a controlled local study of 60 runs over two fixed 64-case suites, three installed models, partitioned local Bulk and Controlled Local Parallel, and five repetitions per configuration. The evaluation also reconstructs a three-rater human consensus and includes a deterministic TF–IDF reference. In the controlled study, mean Test Redundancy Ratio ranged from 0.0063 to 0.5000 for partitioned Bulk and from 0.1250 to 0.6375 for Parallel. Item-level modal agreement ranged from 98.44% to 100% for Bulk and from 75.31% to 97.19% for Parallel, while mean artifact-scoped Scenario Coverage Preservation ranged from 0.900 to 1.000. The results show greater configuration sensitivity for Parallel under the evaluated protocol. However, the workloads differ and do not support a causal ranking of the strategies. The implementation is publicly available. The conclusions are limited to pre-execution semantic refinement and do not establish executability, coverage, mutation adequacy, or fault detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bağlum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: