Rice (Oryza sativa L.) constitutes a primary food source for a significant proportion of the global population and its grain quality directly influences market value and consumer acceptance. Grain discolouration (GD), largely attributable to seed-borne pathogens and occasionally to insect infestation, poses a critical challenge by compromising visual quality and reducing commercial grade. This study evaluated the performance of advanced deep learning models for automated detection and classification of discoloured rice grains, incorporating criteria related to predictive accuracy, computational requirements and environmental sustainability. Among the assessed architectures, DenseNet121 exhibited the highest accuracy (98 %), followed by MobileNet (96 %) and MobileNetV2 (92 %), each demonstrating strong precision, recall and F1 scores. In contrast, VGG19 recorded comparatively lower accuracy (84 %). Computational and energy analysis revealed that DenseNet121, MobileNet and Xception required shorter training durations and lower computational resources, whereas MobileNetV2 and InceptionV3 were comparatively resource-intensive. Notably, MobileNet demonstrated superior energy efficiency, consuming 19.03 watts and generating 0.00952 kg carbon dioxide (CO₂), whereas InceptionV3 consumed 377.27 watts and emitted 0.18864 kg CO₂. To facilitate comprehensive model prioritisation, the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was employed, identifying MobileNet as the optimal model when considering performance, efficiency and environmental impact. The findings highlight the potential applicability of lightweight deep learning architectures, particularly MobileNet and DenseNet121, in real-time rice grading and sorting systems, supporting sustainable post-harvest management, improving grain quality assurance and mitigating seed-borne pathogen dissemination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soumen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: