This study evaluated the association between epidural labor analgesia (ELA) and a positive Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) screen at 6 weeks postpartum among singleton primiparous women planning vaginal delivery and explored a parsimonious prediction model. This single-center prospective preference-based cohort enrolled 200 women with spontaneous onset of labor between July and December 2021. Participants chose whether to receive ELA. The primary outcome was a positive EPDS screen (score ≥ 9) at postpartum day 42. The primary logistic regression model included ELA, educational attainment, and antenatal fear of labor pain; post-exposure variables were excluded. Sensitivity analyses used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on baseline characteristics. The fixed three-variable model was also presented as an exploratory nomogram and internally validated using 1,000 bootstrap resamples. The final analysis included 184 women (ELA, n = 93; no-ELA, n = 91). Positive EPDS screens occurred in 13/93 women (14.0%) in the ELA group and 25/91 (27.5%) in the no-ELA group (Yates-corrected P = 0.038), with an absolute risk difference of − 13.49% points (95% CI − 24.92 to − 1.75). The adjusted odds ratio for ELA was 0.49 (95% CI 0.23–1.07; P = 0.075). IPTW estimates were directionally similar, but their confidence intervals included the null. The exploratory nomogram had an apparent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.720 and an optimism-corrected C-statistic of 0.708. ELA recipients had a lower unadjusted rate of positive EPDS screening, but adjusted and weighted confidence intervals included the null. These findings do not establish a causal protective effect and require cautious interpretation given the preference-based design, potential residual confounding, and limited sample size. The exploratory prediction model requires external validation before clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: