Introduction: Self-medication is common among medical students, but few Malaysian studies have examined it alongside non-pharmacological self-care. This study determined the prevalence and frequency of self-medication, assessed risk awareness, and described non-pharmacological measures among preclinical and clinical medical students. Methods: This single-centre cross-sectional survey included 204 students (preclinical years 1-2, n=81; clinical years 3-5, n=123) from July to August 2025. Self-medication was defined as medicine use without a current professional consultation. Stratified prevalence estimates were calculated for over-the-counter medicines, reuse of previous prescriptions, supplements, herbal products and topical preparations. Descriptive statistics and stage-specific comparisons were used; ordinal logistic regression examined frequency among the 199 students who self-medicated. The proportional odds assumption was met. Results: Self-medication was reported by 199/204 students (97.5%). Of these, 106/199 (53.3%) reported rare use and 72/199 (36.2%) reported occasional use. Year 4 students had lower odds of more frequent self-medication than Year 5 students (odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.85; p=0.026). Clinical students more often recognised medication misuse/overuse (103/123, 83.7% vs 55/81, 67.9%; p=0.008) and drug interactions (61/123, 49.6% vs 18/81, 22.2%; p<0.001). Personal adverse effects were reported more often by preclinical students (8/81, 9.9% vs 3/123, 2.4%; p=0.028). Non-pharmacological measures were reported by 73/81 (90.1%) preclinical and 113/123 (91.9%) clinical students (p=0.667); exercise was most common. Leading reasons were quick relief (56.8%), minor illness (21.1%), and previous experience (17.1%). Conclusion: Self-medication was very common in this volunteer sample. Structured education on rational medicine use and safe self-care is warranted, but multicentre longitudinal studies measuring clinical appropriateness and effectiveness are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismawi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: