Background Accurate differentiation between benign and malignant spinal tumors is critical for treatment planning, yet manual interpretation of T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI remains subjective, with substantial inter-observer variability. This study aimed to develop a deep learning model, the multi-scale deep residual network (MSDR-Net), for automated benign–malignant classification. Methods A total of 500 T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR images of pathologically confirmed spinal tumors (389 benign, 111 malignant) were retrospectively collected from two institutions. Data were partitioned into training (70%), validation (20%), and independent test (10%) sets, and five-fold cross-validation was performed. Leave-one-center-out external validation was also performed (development: Institution A, n = 300; evaluation: Institution B, n = 200). The proposed MSDR-Net incorporates multi-branch residual blocks that combine parallel multi-scale convolutional paths with efficient channel attention modules and was benchmarked against six established architectures. Results On the independent test set (N = 50; 12 malignant cases), MSDR-Net achieved 92.0% accuracy, 91.7% sensitivity (95% CI 61.5%–99.8%), 92.1% specificity, and an AUC of 0.921, the highest point estimates among evaluated architectures. The model was well calibrated (Brier score 0.072), with net benefit over treat-all strategies across thresholds of 0.10–0.60. Derived from a small test cohort, these estimates carry substantial uncertainty and await confirmation in larger, prospective cohorts. External-cohort accuracy was 86.5% (AUC 0.875). Ablation experiments showed that removing either component degraded performance, with a modest super-additive interaction; given their substantially smaller capacity, the single-path variants’ deficit cannot be attributed solely to removing multi-scale processing. The model has 55.4M parameters and 12.3-ms inference per image. Conclusion MSDR-Net effectively captures multi-scale discriminative features of spinal tumors on T2-weighted fat-suppressed MRI, achieving high classification accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency. The model shows promise for clinical deployment as an auxiliary diagnostic tool for orthopedic surgeons and radiologists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: