Background/Objectives: Dietary supplements and over-the-counter (OTC) preparations are widely used to self-manage stress, low mood, and disturbed sleep. Population research has treated such use as one undifferentiated behaviour. We examined whether stress and affective burden co-occur with supplement and OTC use in a purpose-specific way and how they relate to self-medication and primary-care contact. Methods: We analysed cross-sectional data from the National Test of Poles’ Health (non-probability, self-selected web survey; wave 5, 2024; N = 120,000), with trend analyses across five cross-sections (2020–2024). Survey-weighted logistic regression related four indicators of psychological burden to purpose-specific use of mood-, sleep-, and memory-targeted products, with a symptom-by-purpose matrix, age- and sex-stratified replication, and E-values. Results: Mood-product use rose along a gradient of psychological burden, from frequent stress (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 1.80, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.72–1.88) through work-related exhaustion (2.17, 2.08–2.26) and poor self-rated mental health (2.44, 2.34–2.55) to a lifetime depression diagnosis (2.53, 2.41–2.65). A lifetime depression diagnosis also co-occurred with sleep (1.92, 1.83–2.01) and memory-product use (1.77, 1.69–1.85), while multivitamin and hair/skin use stayed flat (aOR ≈ 1.0). In this subgroup (n = 21,793), targeted use co-occurred with OTC self-medication (mood 1.70, 1.59–1.83; sleep 1.61, 1.50–1.73) without reduced primary-care contact. Associations were observed in both broad age strata (≤54 vs. >54 years) and both sexes (E-values 4.3–9.5). Purpose-specific use rose across the five cross-sections. Conclusions: Supplement use tracks stress and affective burden in a purpose-specific way and, among respondents reporting a lifetime physician diagnosis of depression, accompanies OTC self-medication. This pattern marks a group whose self-management concentrates on preparations with limited trial support. The scope of these findings is set by two features: the depression measure is lifetime, not an assessment of current symptoms, and the questionnaire recorded the purpose of use, not the product identity, ingredients or dose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urbanowicz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: