The local field factor $G(q)$ of the HEG describes how exchange and correlation modify the response to a static perturbation, and enters dielectric screening, effective electron--electron interactions, and the xc kernel of TDDFT. Accurate zero-temperature data for $G(q)$, however, remain limited to metallic densities, rₛ≤10. In this work, we present diffusion Monte Carlo calculations of the static density response function $χ(q)$ and of $G(q)$ for 2≤ rₛ≤100, and describe and discuss the methodological steps that enabled these calculations. We show how optimization of the perturbing potential in the trial wave function has an important effect, as a poor choice can reverse the sign of the response. A closed-form expression is provided for its optimal value, together with the density dependence of the linear-response window. We further show that backflow correlations leave $χ(q)$ unchanged and that $G(q)$ depends only weakly on system size even at very low density, so that Slater--Jastrow wave functions and modest system sizes suffice. Together, these results provide a practical guide for future QMC calculations of response properties of the electron gas and real materials. Our results agree with previous DMC data at metallic densities for q>kF, and extend them below kF. They also agree with diagrammatic QMC at rₛ=2. At lower densities, our results show that $G(q)$ develops a nonmonotonic structure at intermediate-q, where the response approaches that of the noninteracting gas. Quantitative agreement is seen with finite-temperature path integral Monte Carlo, suggesting that the previously reported finite-temperature structure is inherited from the ground state. Using a parametrization of $G(q)$ that reproduces our data throughout the liquid phase, we relate this structure to short-range order in the pair correlation function and the static structure factor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Güneş et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: