Holistic admissions were conceived for equitable access to competitive health science education (HSE) programs. We evaluated holistic admissions to HSE programs at a community college. Applicants to radiological technology (Rad Tech) (n = 59) and dental hygiene (DH) programs (n = 40) underwent five-item standardized video interviews (SVI) and 30-item multiple mini-interviews (MMI). Holistic admissions did not alter race (Mann Whitney U = .71, p = .48). Moderate reliability (Cronbach's α) was observed for the SVI for Rad Tech (α = .72, CI = .60–.84) and DH (α = .67, CI = .55–.78). High values were observed for the MMI for Rad Tech (α = .87, CI = .83–.91) and DH (α = .90, CI = .86–.94). Large effect sizes ( d >1.3) separated admitted vs. non-admitted groups. Our results indicate holistic admissions are objective and enhance equitable access to competitive HSE programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knupp et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: