Wearable human activity recognition (HAR) requires compact models that can capture temporal dependencies under constrained computation, memory, and energy budgets. Knowledge distillation (KD) offers a practical route to this goal by transferring informative predictions and representations from high-capacity teachers to lightweight students. Existing KD methods for wearable HAR, however, remain limited when structurally different teachers are involved. They commonly rely on homogeneous architectures, use mainly teacher-to-student transfer, and provide limited support for heterogeneous multi-teacher learning. This work proposes a decoupled heterogeneous multi-teacher mutual distillation (DHMMD) framework for wearable HAR. DHMMD performs offline reciprocal optimization between multiple heterogeneous teachers and a compact student, while only the distilled student is retained for inference. The framework combines two complementary paths. Bidirectional decoupled semantic distillation transfers target-class and non-target-class probability information through both aggregated and teacher-specific guidance. Bidirectional contrastive feature distillation aligns intermediate representations across heterogeneous architectures using ensemble-level and pairwise feature supervision. Experiments on HAPT, WISDM, and UCI_HAR show that DHMMD outperforms 21 state-of-the-art KD baselines in terms of F 1 score. Under the MLP-student setting, DHMMD improves the F 1 score by 9.30 percentage points on WISDM. On-device latency measurements on Raspberry Pi 4 and PYNQ-Z2, together with board-power-based energy estimation and memory accounting, further show that the distilled students reduce inference cost relative to the heterogeneous teachers. These results indicate that DHMMD is a practical offline training framework for compact wearable HAR models on mobile and application-processor-class edge platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: