Background Neuropsychological Rehabilitation has traditionally relied on models that conceptualize cognition primarily as a property of the individual brain. However, many established rehabilitation practices extend beyond the individual, involving cognitive artifacts (e.g., tools), modifications of the physical environment, and the coordinated contribution of other people. This creates a potential mismatch between how cognition is theoretically conceptualized and how rehabilitation is practiced. Objective In this conceptual article, we examine how Extended and Distributed Cognition may help address this discrepancy. Drawing on the historical work of Kurt Goldstein, contemporary cognitive science, and evidence-based rehabilitation practice, we distinguish Extended Cognition , which emphasizes how external resources can become integrated into an individual's cognitive processes, from Distributed Cognition , which examines how cognitive activity is organized across people, artifacts, and environments. Implications We argue that these perspectives broaden both the unit of analysis and the potential targets of rehabilitation: intervention may involve not only changing cognitive processes within the individual, but also introducing or reorganizing cognitive artifacts, modifying environments, and changing how other people interact with the person. Established practices including external compensatory strategies, communication partner training, environmental modification, and the coordinated organization of rehabilitation teams illustrate the clinical relevance of this perspective. Conclusion Extended and Distributed Cognition may therefore provide a complementary theoretical framework for understanding how cognition is supported and reorganized in everyday life after brain injury, helping to bridge the persistent gap between neuropsychological mechanisms and everyday functioning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: