Purpose This study examines the pathways linking symbolic, epistemic, and emotional consumption values with customer citizenship behavior in co-branded beverage consumption, and how scarcity conditions these relationships. Design/methodology/approach An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was adopted. Study 1 analyzed survey data from 573 Chinese consumers with co-branded beverage purchase experience using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Study 2 used semi-structured interviews with 22 experienced consumers to contextualize the quantitative findings. Findings The results identified three significant indirect relationships with customer citizenship behavior: symbolic value through conspicuous consumption, epistemic value through co-creation, and emotional value through co-brand love. The emotional-attachment route showed the strongest indirect effect. Scarcity operated as a selective boundary condition: it negatively moderated the symbolic value–conspicuous consumption relationship, did not significantly moderate the epistemic value–co-creation relationship, and negatively moderated the emotional value–co-brand love relationship, with a small-to-medium interaction effect. Qualitative insights further suggest that scarcity may shift from meaningful exclusivity to purchase friction and emotional disruption. Practical implications Brands should design co-branded beverage campaigns that create symbolic visibility, participatory novelty, and emotional attachment, while managing scarcity to avoid stockouts, unclear rules, and consumer frustration. Originality/value This study extends consumption value theory by identifying pathway-specific value-conversion mechanisms in co-branded beverage consumption and refines scarcity research by showing its selective boundary role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: