Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) restructuring in April 2022 required listed firms to choose among Prime, Standard and Growth segments under differentiated listing maintenance criteria, aimed at improving capital efficiency. Using a panel of 1297 firms (FY2018–FY2024), this study applied a difference-in-differences (DiD) design comparing higher-pressure and lower-pressure groups defined by ex ante firm characteristics. Four institutional pressures were examined: overall reform pressure on all sample firms; selection pressure on vulnerable firms (ROE below 8% or PBR below 1.0); self-disciplining pressure from segment choice among former First Section firms; and monitoring pressure from compliance plan disclosure. Vulnerable firms (73.1% of the sample) showed the largest relative adjustments, with ROE 2.767 percentage points and PBR 0.356 higher relative to non-vulnerable firms and smaller dividend intensity growth (−0.214 percentage points). Prime selectors raised dividend intensity by 0.142 percentage points more than Standard selectors, a difference that loses significance when the three classifications are modeled jointly. Compliance plan disclosure was linked to marginally significant ROE gains. However, PBR gains were short-lived, suggesting investor skepticism. Overall, selection pressure was associated with the strongest changes, whereas self-disciplining and monitoring effects were muted, underscoring both the promise and limits of market-based governance reform for listed firms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yukiko Konno (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: