Cognitive, behavioral, demographic, and digital factors affect psychological well-being in university students, but their interaction in predicting psychological well-being is not fully characterized. This study aimed to develop and compare machine-learning models for predicting psychological well-being and identify the most influential predictors. Secondary cross-sectional data from undergraduate students aged 18–24 years were analyzed, with psychological well-being modeled as a continuous outcome using 17 behavioral, cognitive, demographic, and digital predictors. Linear Regression, Elastic Net, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were evaluated using nested five-fold cross-validation and an independent 20% test set. Model performance was assessed using R², RMSE, and MAE, while permutation importance quantified predictor contribution. The final analytical sample included 607 participants. SVR achieved the strongest independent test performance (R² = 0.4216, RMSE = 0.4216, MAE = 0.3015), with nested cross-validation showing closely comparable performance to Elastic Net. Growth mindset emerged as the most important predictor with a permutation R² importance of 0.9059 ± 0.1182, while the other variables of FOMO, social comparison, demographic characteristics and platform-use variables were not as important. The results indicate that psychological well-being can be accurately predicted at a moderate level by a comprehensible multivariable model, with the cognitive characteristics offering more predictive information than the general digital use metrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tripathi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: