Background: Advances in cancer treatment mean many individuals with incurable cancer live for extended periods, creating opportunities for early integration of palliative care. High-quality communication about illness trajectory, patient values, and goals is a core mechanism through which early palliative care improves patient and family outcomes. Yet patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes reflecting these domains are rarely measured early in the illness trajectory. To address this gap, we tested the feasibility of collecting validated patient- (and caregiver-) reported outcome measures (PROMs) capturing domains central to serious illness communication (SIC) and more broadly, an early palliative approach to care. Methods: In this cross-sectional study at a regional cancer centre, patients with incurable cancer and their caregivers completed an online survey within three days of a routine oncology visit. PROMs included Feeling Heard and Understood, Herth Hope Index, Illness Understanding, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale (caregivers only). Feasibility metrics included recruitment, completion rates, data completeness, and perceived importance of PROMs. Results: Seventy-two patients and 65 caregivers completed the survey (83% and 95% of those approached). All prespecified feasibility metrics were met, with minimal missing data and high willingness to repeat surveys (>93%). Most respondents (>79%) rated each PROM as important. PROM scores were a secondary descriptive outcome, with hope and feeling heard and understood rated relatively high. For illness understanding, 17% of patients and 9% of caregivers believed the cancer would be cured completely. Caregiver emotional burden was substantial: 49% reported elevated anxiety compared with 31% of patients. Conclusions: Collecting PROMs reflecting communication quality, illness understanding, hope, anxiety and depression, and caregiving preparedness early in the incurable cancer trajectory appeared feasible within the conditions of this study and suggests a practical way to evaluate outcomes central to SIC, which is a key part of an early palliative approach to care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seow et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: