Increasing belowground carbon sequestration through forest management has significant potential to mitigate rising atmospheric CO2 but is rarely used in C-credit systems. Difficulty in, and expense of, quantifying changes in soil C, along with large but somewhat ambiguous results in trials, has hindered its use in C-credit systems. Growing N2-fixing trees, however, has been widely suggested to consistently increase soil C. We review evidence from empirical and ecosystem process studies to evaluate whether consistent belowground C sequestration is present in the most widely studied N2-fixing-tree genus Alnus (alder). We searched globally for studies that included measures of change in mineral-soil C, including chronosequence studies and field trials. We found studies that also compared alder effects against non-N2-fixing species, which link to additionality calculations (relative C sequestration). We found that: (1) the empirical evidence of positive soil-C accretion under alder is large and unidirectional for all studies; (2) ecosystem process studies provide multiple mechanisms that can explain the observations; and (3) both empirical and mechanistic evidence persist across a wide array of climate, soils, and disturbance regimes. We suggest that evidence is sufficiently consistent to establish an interim 0.5 Mg ha−1 yr−1 standard when considering C-credits, especially in decisions on whether to include alders to mitigate rising CO2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bormann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: