Background and objectives: Cannabis-related harms vary across psychiatric, cognitive, neurological, developmental and functional outcomes. This monograph combines a critical evidence review with original secondary meta-analyses and probability modeling to assess harm, susceptibility and recovery, and to develop a literature-derived risk questionnaire.Methods: Original frequentist and Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses of published longitudinal estimates were conducted under six selected specifications for psychosis, depression and anxiety, with source-verification, cohort-overlap and prior-sensitivity analyses. Published reviews, cohorts and experiments were critically synthesized. Eight MEDLINE-source queries with a publication cutoff of 18 October 2026 yielded 1,719 title assessments and 292 documented abstract assessments. Twenty-five principal regression specifications and two alternative cannabis use disorder models were fitted to published longitudinal aggregates to support a forty-five-item questionnaire. Cannabis use disorder models underwent internal held-out comparisons and 500 bootstrap replications. Prenatal associations underwent dependence and numerical-precision analyses.Results: The original two-cohort synthesis of higher adolescent exposure and psychotic disorder yielded a pooled relative association of 2.67 (modified Hartung–Knapp 95% CI 0.06–115.26); the Bayesian pooled median was 2.38 (95% credible interval 1.05–4.80). All six selected frequentist intervals included unity, and strict primary-source verification left insufficient studies for an anxiety pool. Across the broader literature, evidence was strongest for acute psychiatric and cognitive effects, cannabis use disorder and withdrawal, and psychosis-related harm. Published pooled cannabis use disorder prevalence among users was 22% (95% CI 18–26%); educational disruption included increased school dropout (odds ratio 2.19; 95% CI 1.73–2.78). Cognitive differences were small on average and smaller in studies requiring abstinence. Depression, suicidality and mania showed adverse observational associations; anxiety, motivation, employment, interpersonal and neurological findings were less consistent. Prenatal associations were most consistent for impaired fetal growth and prematurity; malformation and later developmental findings were heterogeneous. Internal predictive performance varied substantially by subgroup, and modeled uncertainty frequently prevented stable risk-category assignment.Interpretation: Original meta-analyses and probability models quantify selected associations and their uncertainty within a broader assessment of cannabis-related harm. Frequent high-THC exposure, early initiation, established psychiatric illness and pregnancy warrant particular concern; causal certainty varies by outcome. Questionnaire reports provide outcome-specific source projections with uncertainty estimates. External clinical and psychometric validation has not been performed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeffrey Satinover (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: