This study aims to characterise the combined influence of fibre orientation and graphene nanoplatelet (GNP) modification on the thermo-viscoelastic response of glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites and to establish a machine learning framework to predict this response across all tested configurations. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was performed in three-point bending mode on autoclave-moulded neat and 0.25 wt.% GNP-reinforced GFRP laminates with 0° and 90° fibre orientations, over 30-120°C at four frequencies (1, 10, 25, and 50 Hz). The experimental dataset comprised 4500 data points. Time-temperature superposition (TTS) master curves were constructed at reference temperatures of 83.9°C (neat GFRP) and 97.7°C (GNP-GFRP), fitted using a generalised Maxwell model with N = 8 elements (R 2 > 0.99). Four machine learning models were trained on an 80/20 split and validated by 5-fold cross-validation. The random forest (RF) model achieved R 2 = 0.9996 ± 0.0001 for storage modulus, R 2 = 0.9915 ± 0.0023 for loss modulus, and R 2 = 0.9964 ± 0.0009 for tan δ, substantially outperforming linear regression, SVR, and MLP-ANN. GNP addition elevates T g by approximately 10°C and increases the equilibrium modulus from 9700 to 11200 MPa, demonstrating effective thermal stiffening of the GFRP composite.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tudu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: