The pupil famously adjusts its dilation in response to light, but its role extends far beyond this basic sensory function. Its fluctuations index arousal and mental effort, beyond luminance-related dynamics, making it a sensitive marker of internal cognitive states. A growing body of work shows that these pupil-linked signals extend beyond the visual domain. However, which processes drive pupil responses in more naturalistic settings remains unclear as most evidence comes from tightly controlled paradigms that strip away the richness of real-world experience. Language offers a uniquely powerful window into this question, as it can allow us to create rich paradigms without having any visual, i.e. luminance, confounds. Moreover, language comprehension hinges on continuous prediction: listeners constantly generate expectations about upcoming input, and the discrepancy between expectation and actual input - contextual prediction error, or surprisal - carries measurable cognitive costs. Here, we tested the hypothesis that pupil-linked arousal indexes these linguistic surprisal signals during naturalistic listening. We recorded pupil responses while volunteers listened to naturalistic spoken stories in darkness, which were either intact or reversed. Reversed speech preserves the acoustics of the signal while destroying its intelligibility. Pupil dilation selectively tracked lexical surprisal within a late window of 1,700 to 2,350 milliseconds following word onset, in forward, but not control, backward speech. These findings indicate that pupil-linked arousal is tuned to global, context-dependent processing, tracking the cognitive cost of updating a predictive model during naturalistic listening.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terzo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: