Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Current-induced vortex shedding imposes repeated cross-flow loading on offshore wind monopiles, yet its effect on the lateral pile-soil response is not explicitly represented in conventional p-y formulations. This study used a validated three-dimensional ABAQUS model of a large diameter monopile in sand to evaluate static in-line drag, equivalent peak cross flow lift, and stabilized harmonic lift at representative elevations. Static and post-cyclic p-y curves were extracted after up to 104 cycles and compared with the American Petroleum Institute (API) sand relation. The in-line load governed the short-term displacement and bending-moment response, whereas repeated cross flow loading progressively reduced the mobilized soil resistance. After 104 cycles, the reduction reached approximately 6.0–12.5% at z = D/2 and 6.75–13.4% at z = D across the representative low and high load cases. The numerical curves also exhibited a lower initial soil reaction modulus than the API prediction within the investigated shallow zone. A modified p-y formulation was therefore developed by combining a nonlinear depth dependent reference modulus with a cycle dependent degradation coefficient. The formulation provides an engineering representation of VIV-related stiffness degradation for the investigated monopile sand system and loading range.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: