Objectives: To examine whether longer waits for hip and knee replacement were associated with higher post-operative patient dissatisfaction and smaller patient-reported functional improvement, and whether worse post-operative satisfaction was associated with smaller functional improvement, in National Health Service (NHS) care in England. Design: Retrospective observational study linking respondent-level Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to provider-year Referral to Treatment (RTT) waiting times, with a supplementary comparison of the wait-dissatisfaction relationship in general practice. Setting: NHS-funded hip and knee replacement in England, 2017, 2018, 2022 and 2023, excluding the pandemic-affected years 2019-2021. Participants: 107,700 hip and 122,756 knee replacement PROMs respondents, and all 42 Integrated Care Boards (168 ICB-year observations) for the general practice comparison. Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Post-operative dissatisfaction (fair or poor on a five-point satisfaction scale) and Oxford Score improvement (post-operative minus pre-operative score). Secondary outcomes were EQ-5D improvement and the full five-category satisfaction score. Results: Each additional 30 days of average wait was associated with a 0.05 increase in the log-odds of post-operative dissatisfaction for hip (95% CI 0.03 to 0.08) and 0.04 for knee (0.03 to 0.06), and with smaller Oxford Score improvement (hip -0.26 points, -0.44 to -0.08; knee -0.11 points, -0.22 to -0.01). Mean Oxford Score improvement fell monotonically across satisfaction categories, from 26.11 points (hip) and 22.74 points (knee) among patients reporting excellent satisfaction to 2.62 and -0.01 points among those reporting poor satisfaction. In general practice, the wait-dissatisfaction association was close to zero but too imprecise to rule out an association of the size seen for hip and knee replacement. Conclusions: In this focused surgical pathway, waiting times, post-operative satisfaction and patient-reported recovery were consistently associated, and satisfaction carried information about patient-reported recovery, not only about the experience of care. Performance frameworks that apply a common satisfaction measure across care settings should not assume it carries the same outcome content in each.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joseph et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: