Street-view imagery (SVI) is widely used to quantify key indicators of urban environment, such as greenery, sky, or road view indices. However, relatively few studies have examined controlled SVI synthesis that combines explicit target proportions of trees, sky, buildings, and roads with road-layout masks, while also testing conflicts between textual and spatial controls. To address this gap, we propose a generative multimodal AI framework that synthesizes alternative streetscapes conditioned on targeted visual metrics, enabling direct visual exploration of urban scenarios. We first construct a multimodal dataset that aligns SVIs with textual descriptions, segmentation maps, road masks, and quantitative metrics of visual elements in Chicago and Orlando. Using this dataset, we demonstrate that diffusion models can produce realistic and semantically consistent streetscape imagery while responding to both textual and imagery controls. Our quantitative evaluations show that incorporating visual controls can improve semantic consistency, reducing the LPIPS index by approximately 6% while maintaining global visual realism. In addition, overall semantic consistency increases by 23.7% in Orlando and 46.4% in Chicago, as measured by the mIoU index, with class-wise gains exceeding 100% improvement for building view indices. Streetscape generation shows directional and interpretable responses to both visual and textual prompts, and when textual and visual controls conflict, imagery controls tend to dominate, indicating a clear control hierarchy and the importance of further developing visual controls for urban scene generation. Overall, this work establishes an important benchmark for streetscape generation using SVIs and diffusion models, and illustrates how generative AI can support controllable and exploratory urban scenario visualization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: