Port authorities must commit service capacity before monthly vessel demand is known. This study develops a multiobjective linear programming model based on Bertsimas–Sim Γ-robustness that jointly determines lower-cost regular capacity and higher-cost surge capacity. Monthly vessel-call uncertainty is represented by a budgeted uncertainty set, while an independent full-stress constraint imposes a minimum service level when all modeled upward deviations occur. A lexicographic ε-constraint procedure generates Pareto-optimal cost–shortage policies, and a balanced policy is selected by distance to the ideal point. The model is evaluated using 2020 data from 28 Chilean maritime authorities and validated with 2018–2022 data. At Γ = 0.10, the balanced policy allocates 647.0 regular and 207.5 surge units and achieves 98.41% full-stress service, with CostIdx 21% above the minimum-cost policy. The 15% deviation matches the historical year-ahead bound, and Γ = 0.10 is the smallest tested budget meeting the 95% out-of-sample target in three of four transitions. Full-stress reliability is the main CostIdx driver, whereas the base-capacity quantile mainly determines the capacity mix. Among alternatives meeting the same full-stress standard, the proposed model has the lowest CostIdx without requiring an assumed demand distribution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Durán et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: