Manuscript (version 2) prepared for Waste Management. Very large landfills are major methane sources, but site decisions rarely combine operator-reported capture, independent emission estimates and the economics of competing gas uses. A Latin-hypercube Monte Carlo decision model (300,000 draws) of landfill-gas generation, collection, surface emission and oxidation, selective covers, biomethane upgrading, additional power generation and photovoltaics is applied to the Norte III landfill in Buenos Aires. A bottom-up generation prior is constrained by satellite emission estimates at their own observation date (2022) and carried forward to the 2025-26 decision period, with three observation-error models; the inferred collection efficiency is about 0.13 (2022) and 0.14 (2025-26), a model output, not a measurement. Methane, carbon and energy balances close for every scenario. Under the assumed no-credit conditions, none of the eight integrated intervention scenarios has a positive median incremental net present value; additional engines on surplus gas, reported separately, are profitable in most draws at merchant tariffs, whereas biomethane needs about US$0.46 per Nm3 (US$14 per MMBtu). A cover reduces net emissions only when the captured share of blocked gas exceeds an analytic break-even. Economic priors are anchored to dated Argentine benchmarks; conclusions are tested against correlated inputs, alternative priors, structural alternatives, tax, financing, credits and time-varying gas supply.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leon Sandler (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: