Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Emerging adulthood involves impactful developmental milestones for sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals and is a critical period for understanding stress processes. Most existing SGM stress research is cross-sectional, with relatively little known about the everyday experiences that may confer mental health risk or resilience for SGM emerging adults. N = 104 SGM emerging adults (age: M = 20.21 years, SD = 1.92 years; 76% assigned female at birth; 35% gender minority; 53% Bisexual+; 55% White) were recruited to codesign (Phases 1-2) or complete for 14 days (Phase 3) a daily diary measure of identity-related and non-identity-related stressors and positive identity-related experiences. Phase 1 participants (n = 8) completed qualitative interviews and provided feedback on an initial draft measure. Phase 2 participants (n = 6) piloted a revised measure for seven days before providing feedback in qualitative interviews. Phase 3 participants (n = 90) completed the final measure for 14 days. Qualitative data from Phases 1-2 were analyzed using the immersion-crystallization framework, and descriptive statistics were computed for Phase 3 quantitative data. In Phases 1-2, participants emphasized the need to capture chronic stressors and stress tied to recent sociopolitical events in the U.S. In Phase 3, non-identity-related stressors were more frequent than identity-related stressors, proximal identity-related stressors were more frequent than distal identity-related stressors, and negative intersectional experiences and positive identity-related experiences were both common. Results highlight the importance of involving participants with lived experiences in all stages of survey design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
French et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: