Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Resting electroencephalography (EEG) is sensitive to eye condition, yet the reorganization of pediatric EEG microstates between eyes-closed (EC) and eyes-open (EO) rest remains incompletely characterized. Paired EC and EO recordings from 110 children in the Healthy Brain Network were analyzed using polarity-invariant two-level clustering, backfitting, and within-participant tests of microstate duration, coverage, occurrence, and transition measures. Eye opening shortened A and C segments, increased the occurrence of all four K = 4 classes, and redistributed coverage from C toward B. All eight significant K = 4 temporal effects retained their direction after participant-wise duration matching and template re-estimation, and broad state sensitivity was also observed at K = 6. Change-score and baseline-adjusted analyses yielded comparable EC-to-EO response profiles among the comparison group without the target diagnoses, ADHD-only group, and ADHD+Anxiety group. The association between posterior alpha reactivity and switching varied in magnitude and direction across segmentation specifications. A stable fourth K = 4 map showed little correspondence with adult microstate D, whereas a D-like map emerged at K = 6. Pediatric microstate measures reflect both physiological context and analytical definition; eye condition, model order, temporal smoothing, and analyzed duration should therefore be specified explicitly in developmental and clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: