n this study We utilized GPS - based TEC data from four ground based stations: Thule, Greenland and Ny-Alesund, Norway in the Northern hemisphere, and Syogo and Palmer in the Southern Hemisphere. While earlier studies have explored storm-time TEC fluctuations caused by mechanisms such as prompt penetration Electric fields (PPEF), disturbance dynamo effects , and thermospheric composition changes, high-latitude ionospheric behaivor- particularly during this specific storm has received relatively little attention. Furthermore, important irregularities like ploar cap patches and subauroral ion drifts remain underexplored in hemispheric comparisons. This work fills a critical gap by presenting a comparative , high-resolution analysis of Vertical TEC in both hemispheres, integrating key geophysical drivers such as Polar cap index, AE(AL/AU) indices, IMF Bz, and SYM-H. Results reveal distinct hemispheric responses: VTEC peaks at ∼ 19 TECU (Thule), ∼ 10 TECU (Ny-Ålesund), ∼ 21 TECU (Syowa), and ∼ 22 TECU (Palmer), with stronger variability observed in SH stations. These differences are attributed to enhanced solar EUV exposure, hemispheric magnetic field assymetries, and intensified particle precipitation during storm-time electrodynamic conditions. By providing new insights into the dynamics of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling during geomagnetic storms. This study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of high-latitude space weather effects and sets the stage for future modeling and monitoring efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zelele et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: