Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To evaluate the outcome of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma in the hepatobiliary unit. Study Design: Prospective analytical study Place and Duration of study: Pak-Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from Jun 23 to Feb 24 Methodology: Fifty-five consecutive patients with periampullary carcinoma underwent PPPD or Whipple procedure. A non-probability consecutive sampling technique was applied. Data were collected on the patients' demographics, intraoperative factors, pathology, and postoperative outcomes, including blood loss, hospital stay, complications, mortality, and weight changes. Results: Of the 55 patients, 58.18% were male. Their mean preoperative weight was 70.07+ 7.91 kg, and their mean age was 59.32 + 7.03 years. Groups A and B had substantially different intraoperative blood loss (p< 0.05) and procedure durations (244.28 ± 44.59 ml; 337.86 ± 32.92min) and 351.48 ± 48.57ml; 342.22+49.33 min). Relaparotomy, delayed stomach emptying, and positive resection margins were among the post-surgery complications rates that did not significantly differ between groups (p> 0.05). Group-A's mortality rate was 17.8%, whereas Group-B's was 11.11% (p = 0.478). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that, in cases with periampullary malignancy, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy is a preferable option to the Whipple approach, since it minimizes perioperative problems and enhances postoperative quality of life. To improve surgical methods and patient selection, further research is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siddique et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: