This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In the context of Industry 4.0, the need for intelligent operator-assistive technologies has driven interest in hybrid systems that improve efficiency in manual-centric assembly workflows. Traditional manual methods often lack structured task sequencing, resulting in variable performance and extended completion times. This paper presents the development of a Pick-to-Light (PTL) assembly guidance system, integrated with LabVIEW Vision Builder for Automated Inspection (VBAI), aimed at improving assembly time performance and ensuring real-time validation. The system features IR (infrared) sensor-activated trays and dynamic projection overlays to guide users through part selection and placement, with all signal logic managed via a MODBUS-based graphical interface using TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) communication. A structured experimental study was conducted to compare the system's effectiveness against traditional manual assembly methods by assembling a computer motherboard. Results show that a significant reduction in average assembly time from 3.03 minutes (manual) to 2.16 minutes (PTL-guided prototype), representing a 28.7% improvement in time efficiency. This indicates an overall improvement of approximately 47 seconds per participant when using the PTL-guided prototype. This gain is attributed to reduced decision-making time, improved task visibility, and real-time visual feedback. The findings demonstrate that combining interactive pick signaling with spatial visual guidance offers a practical and scalable solution for improving time efficiency in manual assembly environments, particularly for small-to-medium-scale manufacturers transitioning toward smart, semi-automated manufacturing environments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: