Rapid urbanization intensifies the overlap between natural hazards and persistent land-use disturbance in coastal agricultural landscapes, yet how these pressures jointly shape ecological risk remains unclear. In the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA), we applied a hazard–vulnerability–ecological asset exposure (H–V–E) framework using 2000–2020 data and 5 km gridded assessment units, integrating rainstorm-induced flooding, tropical cyclones, human-induced landscape disturbance, and ecological–environmental and socioeconomic vulnerability. The framework uses ecosystem service value (ESV) as a proxy for ecological assets potentially exposed to loss and identifies eight H–V–E configurations to interpret risk patterns. Rainstorm-induced flooding formed localized hotspots along the central coast and western Pearl River Estuary, whereas tropical cyclone hazard showed a broader southern concentration. Mean landscape ecological risk changed little, but high-risk clusters intensified. ESV declined from CNY 279.12 billion to 262.72 billion over 2000–2020 and remained highest in peripheral forested and agricultural areas. Moderate-to-high integrated ecological risk covered 47.5% of the region. The low H–low V–high E configuration occupied the largest share (30.4%). These findings support differentiated management of cropland and surrounding ecological spaces through hazard mitigation, resilience enhancement, fragmentation control, and ecological asset protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LI et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: