Background: Infection and sepsis represent critical conditions that contribute significantly to mortality among patients in intensive care units, rendering the selection of appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy a crucial aspect of clinical management. Aim: This study aimed to analyze the association between empirical antibiotic therapy with aerobic compared to anaerobic coverage and total clinical improvement as well as mortality within 7 days in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Methods: A retrospective analytical observational study was conducted among ICU and High Care Unit patients at X Hospital Jember from January 2024 to December 2025 using total sampling, yielding 232 subjects who met the inclusion criteria from 665 admitted patients. Results: Data were collected from electronic medical records and analyzed through univariate, bivariate using Chi-Square test, and multivariate analyses using binary logistic regression with SPSS 25. A total of 170 patients (73.3%) received aerobic antibiotics and 62 patients (26.7%) received anaerobic antibiotics. Antibiotic coverage shows no significant association with mortality within 7 days (p-value =0.643) or total clinical improvement (p-value =0.948). Multivariate analysis reveals that a history of surgical procedure is significantly associated with increased clinical improvement (aOR 2.709 (1,527 – 4,806); p-value =0.001) and reduced mortality within 7 days (aOR 0.442 (0,175 – 1,116); p-value =0.012), while ICU admission (aOR 0.363 (0,161 – 0,820); p-value =0.015) and blood transfusion therapy (aOR 0.279 (0,124 – 0,631); p-value =0.002) are also significantly associated with reduced mortality. Conclusion: Empirical antibiotic therapy with either aerobic or anaerobic coverage demonstrates no statistically significant difference in influencing clinical outcomes among critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Novanto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: