Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation requires socio-ecologically viable agroecosystems. To meet this goal, tropical agroforestry must balance yield-biodiversity trade-offs through local and landscape-level management. By integrating assessments of multi-taxa diversity, biocontrol, pollination, crop pests, soil fertility, microclimate, and yield in Amazonian cacao agroforests, we identified ecological-economic synergies. Yield gains were not associated with species loss. Instead, agroforests with high spatial and vertical shade-tree heterogeneity embedded in landscapes combining 30–35% forest cover and 40–45% of other arboreal habitats (e.g., orchards/agroforests) achieved the highest biodiversity and yields. In these landscapes, flying-vertebrate-mediated arthropod suppression doubled cacao yields. Increasing agroforest shade-tree cover from ≈15% to ≈80% yielded a four-fold rise in cacao fruit-set, tripled soil potassium and enhanced thermal buffering. But light limitation, rather than pest pressure, reduced harvestable yields above 30% shade-tree cover. Our findings demonstrate that combined agroforest-level and landscape-scale management can align biodiversity conservation and economic returns in tropical landscapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aycart et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: