Key result
Smartphone ECG detects symptomatic dysrhythmias in ~9% of ED patients with palpitations or pre-syncope.
Why the study?
Following trial evidence that smartphone-based event recorders increase symptomatic ECG capture compared to standard care, this study sought to describe the process of establishing an ambulatory smartphone palpitation and pre-syncope service for patients presenting acutely to the emergency department.
Observational (n=68)
Open-label
No
May support smartphone ECG in ED palpitations evaluation; hypothesis-generating and requires larger validation studies.
Background and Objectives: The IPED study showed that a smartphone-based event recorder increased the number of patients in whom an ECG was captured during symptoms over five-fold to more than 55% at 90 days compared to standard care [1] and concluded that this safe, non-invasive and easy to use device should be considered part of on-going care to all patients presenting acutely with unexplained palpitations or pre-syncope. This study reports the process of establishing a smartphone palpitation and pre-syncope service. Materials and Methods: A clinical Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) was devised, and funding was secured through a business case for the purchase of 40 AliveCor devices in the first instance. The clinic was launched on 22nd July 2019. Results: Between 22nd July 2019 and 31st October 2019, 68 patients seen in the ED with palpitations or pre-syncope were referred to SPACC. 30 were male and 38 female and mean age was 45.8 (SD 15.1) with a range from 18 to 80 years. 50 (74%) patients underwent full investigation. 7 (11%) patients were deemed on first assessment to have non-cardiac palpitations and were not fitted with the device. All patients who underwent full investigation achieved symptomatic rhythm correlation most with sinus rhythm, ventricular ectopics or bigeminy. A symptomatic cardiac dysrhythmia was detected in 6 (8.8%) patients. 3 patients had supraventricular tachycardia; SVT (4%), 2 had atrial fibrillation (3%) and 1 atrial flutter (2%). Qualitative feedback from the SPACC team suggested several areas where improvement to the clinic could be made. Conclusion: We believe a smartphone palpitation service based in ambulatory care is simple to implement and is effective at detecting cardiac dysrhythmia in ED palpitation patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reed et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Palpitations or pre-syncope (n=68). AliveCor/Kardia smartphone-based ambulatory ECG service (SPACC) was evaluated on Detection of a symptomatic cardiac dysrhythmia. The AliveCor smartphone ambulatory ECG clinic detected a symptomatic cardiac dysrhythmia in 8.8% (6/68) of emergency department patients presenting with palpitations or pre-syncope.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: