Key result
Tricuspid ViV and ViR yield zero 30-day mortality but ~43% 3-year major events.
Why the study?
Although transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (TViV) and valve-in-ring (TViR) procedures are increasingly used, data on clinical outcomes, valve performance, and symptomatic improvement remain limited.
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring implantation improve clinical outcomes and symptoms in high-risk patients with prior tricuspid valve repair or replacement?
Cohort (n=75)
Yes
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring implantation improve clinical outcomes and symptoms in high-risk patients with prior tricuspid valve repair or replacement?
Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring implantation provides sustained symptomatic improvement with zero 30-day mortality in high-risk patients, though 3-year mortality remains substantial at 35.6%, particularly in those with advanced disease.
High event rates after tricuspid bioprosthesis warrant cautious patient selection and surveillance; leaves open durability questions for larger prospective studies.
Background Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (TViV) and valve-in-ring (TViR) procedures are increasingly used; however, data on clinical outcomes, valve performance, and symptomatic improvement remain limited. Objectives To evaluate a real-world multicenter cohort undergoing transcatheter TViV and TViR procedures. Methods We conducted an international multicenter registry including patients undergoing TViV/TViR procedures. The TRIVIR Registry evaluated all-cause mortality and a composite endpoint (CE), defined as all-cause mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and tricuspid bioprosthesis degeneration during follow-up. Results Between 2012 and 2025, 75 patients underwent TViV (n=62) or TViR (n=13) across 16 centers using Sapien (88%) or Myval (12%) valves. Median follow up was 1.86 years (IQR 0.10-2.59). Mean age was 62±13 years, and 69% were women. NYHA class III–IV decreased from 72% at baseline to 13% at 1-3 months and remained low during follow-up. No 30-day deaths occurred, while periprocedural complications occurred in 24% of procedures, mostly minor (17.3%). At 3 years, the Kaplan–Meier estimates of all-cause mortality and CE were 35.6% and 42.9%, and the cumulative incidences of HF hospitalization and tricuspid bioprosthesis degeneration were 16.6% and 11.4%, respectively. Patients who died had markers of advanced disease, including higher NT-proBNP levels, greater diuretic requirements, more frequent pacing/CRT implantation, and higher procedural complication rates. Conclusions TViV/TViR represents a viable treatment strategy and provided sustained symptomatic improvement in high-risk patients. Patients who died exhibited a more advanced clinical profile, highlighting the importance of appropriate patient selection, early referral, and treatment in experienced centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berghi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Prior surgical tricuspid valve replacement or ring annuloplasty undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring implantation (n=75). Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve (TViV) or valve-in-ring (TViR) implantation using Sapien or Myval valves was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and tricuspid bioprosthesis degeneration at 3 years. Transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring implantation had 0% 30-day mortality, with 3-year all-cause mortality of 35.6% and composite event rate of 42.9%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: