Th e subject of this paper is to substantiate the selection of the solid rocket propellant type and grain geometry for the sustainer motor of an operational-tactical missile. Th e paper presents a classifi cation of solid propellants (single-base propellants, homogeneous, heterogeneous, and modifi ed double-base propellants) and their physicochemical and ballistic characteristics. A comparative analysis of typical formulations is performed with respect to specifi c impulse, density, smoke signature, crack resistance, and manufacturability. Based on the requirements imposed on operational-tactical missile systems (operating temperature range, storage life, launch signature constraints, and production capabilities), the advantages of heterogeneous composite propellants based on HTPB/AP are justifi ed as a balanced solution providing high energetic performance, mechanical reliability, and manufacturing feasibility. We also consider alternative propellant options (XZDB, CMDB, ADN-based formulations) for applications requiring higher low-smoke constraints or specialized thrust profi les. Based on the above, proposed recommendations for selecting the grain geometry (cast-bonded grains, end-burning, tubular, and slot-channel confi gurations) depend on the required thrust-time profile and structural constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bondarenko et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: