Key result
RAS inhibitors fail to slow arterial stiffness progression compared to other antihypertensives in CKD.
Why the study?
Chronic kidney disease is associated with accelerated arterial stiffness, but evidence on whether renin-angiotensin system inhibitors prevent arterial stiffness is conflicting.
Does a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI)-based antihypertensive regimen reduce the yearly progression of arterial stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity) compared to non-RASI antihypertensive regimens in adults with chronic kidney disease?
Cohort (n=1,201)
Yes
Does a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI)-based antihypertensive regimen reduce the yearly progression of arterial stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity) compared to non-RASI antihypertensive regimens in adults with chronic kidney disease?
Longitudinal use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is not associated with a slower progression of large artery stiffness compared to other antihypertensive classes in patients with chronic kidney disease, suggesting non-RAS mechanisms drive long-term vascular stiffening in this population.
No support for RASI preference to slow stiffness in CKD; leaves open non-RAS mechanisms and should not yet change practice.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with accelerated arterial stiffness, which contributes to its high burden cardiovascular disease. There is conflicting evidence on whether renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) prevent arterial stiffness. We investigated the association between RASIs versus non-RASI antihypertensive medications and yearly changes in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) – a measure of arterial stiffness –using a linear mixed-effects model among participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study. As a secondary analysis, we restricted the cohort to participants on one antihypertensive medication at baseline. Lastly, we used a linear mixed-effects model to evaluate the relationship between RASI use and systolic blood pressure over time. Of the 1 201 participants who met inclusion criteria, 982 were on RASI and 219 were on a non-RASI medication. Individuals on RASI had a non-significant increase in cfPWV (adjusted cfPWV 0.19 m/s per year, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.25) compared to non-RASI users (adjusted cfPWV 0.15 m/s per year, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.30; p = 0.61). In the monotherapy cohort (N = 283), there was no difference in adjusted yearly change in cfPWV between RASI (0.11 m/s per year, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.21) and non-RASI users (0.03 m/s per year, 95% CI −0.14 to 0.20; p = 0.41). In both cohorts, there was no significant difference in systolic blood pressure over time between RASI and non-RASI users. Future research to mitigate the accelerated large artery stiffness in patients with CKD should focus on targetable mechanisms beyond the renin-angiotensin system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shulman et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n=1,201). Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) vs. Non-RASI antihypertensive medications (diuretic, beta-blocker, calcium channel blocker, vasodilator, or alpha2-agonist) was evaluated on Adjusted yearly change in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV, m/s per year) (p=0.61). Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors did not significantly alter yearly arterial stiffness progression (cfPWV 0.19 vs 0.15 m/s/year; p=0.61) compared to non-RASI antihypertensives in CKD patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: