Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Inputs of trace elements derived from coal ash to terrestrial and aquatic environments were investigated near an 83 MW coal-burning power plant. Comparisons were made between terrestrial inputs of trace elements through aerial deposition during 23 years before installation of electrostatic precipitators and aquatic inputs from ash disposal basins after installation. A gaussian plume model was used to predict deposition patterns of 29 trace elements in coal ash about the power plant. Detectable increases of only Sr, As, Sb, and Be in surface soils within 3 km of the power plant were predicted. Concentrations measured in surface soils were largely consistent with these predictions. Measurements of aerial deposition of Cd, Pb, Cu, and Mn at a site 5.5 km distant were similar to those in other rural areas and indicated that little of the measured Cd, Cu, Mn, or Pb was derived from fly ash. Concentrations of 12 heavy metals in effluents from the basin receiving ash were comparable to those predicted in rainfall deposited nearest the plant. It is concluded that at other coal combustion facilities, basin disposal could be a more serious contamination threat to aquatic environments than aerial dispersal of ash.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evans et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: