Key result
Enoxaparin bridging in LVAD patients is linked to ~4-fold higher major bleeding.
Why the study?
Anticoagulation therapy prevents thromboembolic events in patients with LVADs, and this study aimed to determine the safety of enoxaparin for bridging subtherapeutic INR in this population.
Does enoxaparin bridging for subtherapeutic INR increase the risk of major bleeding episodes or alter thrombotic events in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD)?
Cohort (n=118)
No
Does enoxaparin bridging for subtherapeutic INR increase the risk of major bleeding episodes or alter thrombotic events in patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD)?
Enoxaparin bridging for subtherapeutic INR in LVAD patients is associated with a fourfold increased rate of major bleeding during the active bridging period without reducing thrombotic events, warranting clinical caution.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enoxaparin bridging was associated with increased major bleeding during subtherapeutic INR periods in LVAD patients; leaves open whether randomized trials will alter bridging practices.
Anticoagulation therapy is used to prevent thromboembolic events in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). This study aims to determine the safety of low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin) for bridging subtherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) in LVAD patients. In this retrospective single-center study, all patients who underwent LVAD implantation were examined between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. Patients were divided into two groups: enoxaparin bridge and no bridge, with identification of major bleeding episodes (MBEs) and thrombotic events (TEs). Major bleeding episode and TE incidence was compared between the two groups, with subanalysis of incidence in the enoxaparin group between the periods on and off treatment. One hundred eighteen patients were included in this analysis. Fifty-five patients received enoxaparin, whereas 63 patients did not receive enoxaparin, with no significant difference between groups in all baseline characteristics. For the study period, enoxaparin patients had no increased incidence of MBEs (0.53 vs. 0.35 MBE per year; p = 0.12). However, there was a fourfold increase in MBEs during the bridged period in the enoxaparin group (2.02 vs. 0.45 MBE per year; p = 0.03). Major bleeding episodes on versus off enoxaparin had no major difference in transfusion requirements (2.7 ± 2.9 vs. 2.5 ± 3.4 units; p = 0.57) or mortality (p = 0.11). The enoxaparin group trended to a higher incidence of TEs (0.20 vs. 0.11 events per year; p = 0.08). Enoxaparin bridging in patients with subtherapeutic INR is associated with a significantly increased risk of MBEs. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings; however, until then, caution should be used with enoxaparin for bridging in LVAD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhatia et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation with subtherapeutic INR (n=118). Enoxaparin bridging for subtherapeutic INR vs. No enoxaparin bridge (or off-treatment period within the enoxaparin group) was evaluated on Major bleeding episodes (MBEs) per year during bridged vs. off-treatment periods in the enoxaparin group (p=0.03). Enoxaparin bridging in LVAD patients was associated with a fourfold increase in major bleeding episodes during the bridged period (2.02 vs. 0.45 MBE/year; p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: