This technical report is the companion to the concept paper "Topological Ethics: A Geometric Framing for Alignment Regularizers" and documents its four gridworld experiments in full. Each experiment tests a penalty that protects a simulated human's option-space, the cells it can reach. The report gives the methods, every setting with its exact optimum, and the hypotheses with when each was stated. It also includes a disclosed design history covering an invalid early experiment, a discarded layout, and two bugs that were found and fixed. In brief: the penalty kept agents from trapping a stationary human; a candidate formalization of "torsion" added nothing; penalties checked only at periodic audits missed restrictions between checks; with a goal-seeking human, the penalty achieved safety mainly by avoidance; and cooperation appeared only when the penalty encoded a forecast of the human's next one or two moves. Code and data, which reproduce every reported number, are at doi:10.5281/zenodo.23841251. AI disclosure: The experiment code, analyses, and editing were carried out with the assistance of Claude (Anthropic).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Porbeck (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: