Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Digital transformation has reshaped how religious knowledge is produced, distributed, accessed, and validated, while simultaneously generating new challenges for ulama authority and the continuity of Islamic intellectual traditions. This study aims to analyze how ulama in Madura negotiate scholarly authority within algorithmic environments, how the production and validation of religious knowledge are being reconfigured, and how Islamic intellectual traditions respond to these changes. The study employs a qualitative approach with a multisite case study design conducted in Bangkalan, Sampang, Pamekasan, and Sumenep. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and analyses of relevant documents and digital traces, and were subsequently analyzed thematically through cross-case comparison. The findings indicate that digital technologies and artificial intelligence do not automatically replace ulama authority; rather, they transform the conditions under which such authority is produced, accessed, and recognized. Digital visibility, audience engagement, and algorithmic mediation interact with scholarly competence, sanad, institutional structures, and community recognition. The study identifies the emergence of hybrid epistemic legitimacy and demonstrates that the reconstruction of Islamic intellectual traditions occurs as a negotiated continuity rather than as the replacement of tradition by technology. These findings position algorithmic transformation as an epistemological issue in contemporary Islamic studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saro’i et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: