Background: Military service during young adulthood involves demanding occupational conditions, hierarchical relationships, mobility, and periods of separation from family. These conditions may affect sleep, emotional well-being, adjustment, and social functioning. Evidence focused on young adults serving in non-commissioned ranks in specific Indian districts remains limited. Objective: To describe selected psychosocial difficulties reported by young adults serving in non-commissioned ranks of the Indian Army in relation to occupational experiences, sleep, separation from family, adjustment to new environments, and perceived access to psychological support. Methods: The thesis describes a quantitative, cross-sectional questionnaire-based study conducted among Army personnel in Kannur district. Participants were recruited using snowball sampling. A self-structured questionnaire was used, and data collection was reported to have taken place over 15 days, from 15 to 30 August 2026. The thesis reports a pilot study involving 50 personnel; however, the analytic sample size is inconsistent across the document. Many reported percentages occur in increments of 3.3%, suggesting a denominator of approximately 30, whereas the analysis narrative refers to 50 responses. The final sample size therefore requires confirmation. Results: Reported findings indicate concerns related to workplace treatment and communication, sleep, family separation, environmental adjustment, and perceived mental-health support. The thesis reports that 83.3% had received punishment because of another person's fault, 66.7% had experienced humiliating remarks from seniors, and 63.3% did not communicate their problems to seniors. Regarding sleep, 60% reportedly slept for approximately five hours per day, while 43.3% rated their sleep quality as very poor. Family separation was also salient: 40% reportedly always experienced difficulty staying away from home, and 53.3% always experienced extreme stress when leaving family after leave. A perceived need for support was reported by 76.7% for counsellors and 86.7% for psychologists in their units. Conclusion: The descriptive findings suggest that the respondents reported psychosocial concerns across occupational, sleep-related, family, and support domains. The findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the small, geographically restricted sample, self-report design, incomplete psychometric information, and unresolved sample-size inconsistencies. Larger studies using validated measures and transparent ethical procedures are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anjana KP (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: