Building on the affine framework for weighted binomial itineraries developed in the preceding work, we fix two elementary procedures - binomial translation and geometric scaling - and study the relational network that they generate on C-finite recurrence signatures and their Taylor fibers. Binomial translation shifts each characteristic root by h, while geometric scaling multiplies each root by k. Starting from a signature A, we define four additional nodes: B by translating A by 1, C by scaling A by k, D by scaling B by k, and E by translating C by 1. The five nodes form a finite chart inside the affine orbit generated by the affine group of the line. We obtain a universal formula for every directed transition, identify the subgroup generated by translation by 1 and scaling by k together with their inverses, and describe the induced orbit of an arbitrary-order signature. Binomial inversion is exact on sequences and formal signatures, while passage to a minimal signature may lose a zero-root factor and therefore obstruct reconstruction if the numerator is discarded. The network is then lifted from signatures to Taylor fibers. For a rational C-finite state expressed as the quotient of a numerator polynomial N(z) and a recurrence denominator D(z), the affine operator transports the numerator by a linear automorphism whenever the scaling parameter is nonzero. Consequently, two procedures may collide on the recurrence base while remaining distinct in the numerator fiber. Fibonacci, Pell, and the triple-root signature (3, -3, 1) provide explicit examples and OEIS anchors. Finally, we study the Hadamard product of nodes E and D. In arbitrary order, the exchanged-pair symmetry of a Hadamard square disappears generically when k is neither 0 nor 1, restoring formal order d squared; in order two, an exact discriminant factorization classifies the algebraic components on which the order decreases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferraz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: