Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Efficient bus evacuation requires a routing plan that serves all pickup demand while respecting vehicle and shelter capacities. The two-phase heuristic method proposed by Bish constructs a feasible plan and then improves bus routes; however, it does not account for evacuees’ ability to relocate between nearby pickup points. Objective: This study develops a three-phase heuristic method that incorporates selective evacuee self-relocation and route repair. Methods: The proposed method is evaluated using an illustrative instance, three small benchmark instances, and the Kampung Pencut network in Lembang, West Java, Indonesia. Results: For Kampung Pencut, Phase 1 yields a makespan of 446 s, which decreases to 386 s in Phase 2 and 334 s in Phase 3. The additional self-relocation phase reduces the makespan by 13.47% relative to Phase 2 and by 25.11% relative to Phase 1. For the three small benchmark instances without self-relocation, the bus-routing heuristic matches the exact solutions, achieving a 0% optimality gap. The observed CPU times range from 189 to 287 s, compared with 750 to 1,676 s for exact optimization. The speed analysis indicates greater relative improvements at lower bus speeds, with makespan reductions of 19.78% at 20 km/h and 19.30% at 30 km/h. Conclusion: These results suggest that self-relocation can reduce the workload on critical bus routes, particularly when bus travel times are high.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Novianingsih et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: