Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Keystroke dynamics---the timing of a person's key presses and releases---is a low-cost, non-intrusive behavioral biometric. However, public benchmarks and most empirical evidence focus on typing in Latin scripts, predominantly English, and do not cover speakers of Ge'ez-script (Ethiopic) languages such as Amharic, which has more than 35 million native speakers. Ethiopic syllabic characters are commonly entered through multi-key transliteration, creating different motor-planning demands. This raises the question of whether timing-based verification methods developed for Latin scripts transfer effectively to other writing systems. We present and characterize a keystroke dynamics corpus collected from a shared pool of typists completing three text-entry tasks---fixed text, free text, and password entry---in Amharic and English. The corpus contains 114,955 labeled keystroke events across five sub-corpora (4,751--51,813 rows each), with up to 25 raw and derived timing fields per event. We report a systematic exploratory data analysis (EDA) covering structural composition; missingness and duplication; demographic and skill-level coverage; univariate and bivariate timing distributions; feature redundancy (correlation and hierarchical clustering); per-user sample imbalance; and user distinguishability in Principal Component Analysis (PCA), t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE), and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) projections. The analysis finds strongly right-skewed timing features, a small number of algebraically redundant feature pairs, a coefficient of variation in per-user sample counts of up to 2.4, and substantial visual overlap between users in low-dimensional projections. Together, these properties plausibly explain the 40--60% rank-1 accuracy and 10--20% equal error rate (EER) previously obtained with baseline classifiers on this cohort. Based on these diagnostics and recent literature, we recommend feature engineering, session- and user-aware evaluation protocols, and careful model selection for keystroke biometrics in low-resource, non-Latin-script settings. We also make the EDA pipeline available for benchmarking. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of tri-modal keystroke dynamics data in an Ethiopic-script language, providing a reference point for cross-lingual and cross-script research in behavioral biometrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aseres et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: