A brain–computer interface (BCI) allows a person to operate a computer or assistive device through brain activity rather than muscle movement. Electroencephalography (EEG) is widely used for non-invasive BCI work because it records electrical activity at the scalp with fairly portable equipment. In this paper we review EEG-based motor imagery (MI) classification: how signals are acquired, cleaned, converted into features and classified, where the technology can be applied, and why it remains difficult. Imagining a left- or right-hand movement can produce sensorimotor rhythms that a system can distinguish, but doing so reliably is hard. Noise, artifacts, differences between users, small labelled datasets, drift between sessions and limited computing power all get in the way. We present a conceptual pipeline that links preprocessing, feature representation and machine-learning or deep-learning classification. The paper rests on the literature alone. The pipeline has not been tested experimentally, so we do not claim any classification accuracy. Future work should implement it on a suitable public EEG dataset, using reproducible protocols and standard evaluation metrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: