Background: During increasing STIs, we examined whether two geographic factors were associated with racial/ethnic assortative mixing (having a partner with same race/ethnicity) which has been associated with STIs. Methods: We used data from a U.S. household-based survey of 15–49-year-olds (N= 21,441). 2015-2019 response rates were 65.9% (women) and 62.4% (men). We included two measures of geography: residing in a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) and U.S. nativity (measure of migration), and other covariates. Our analytic sample (n=3,678) consisted of 15–44-year-olds who were separated, unmarried, or not cohabiting with an opposite-sex partner and sexually active (past 12 months). Analyses accounted for the complex survey design. Wald F tests and logistic regression were used. Results: In adjusted analyses, U.S. native Hispanic women (aPR=0.76; 0.62-0.92) were significantly less likely to report assortative mixing than non-U.S. native Hispanic women. Among males, U.S. native Hispanic men (aPR=0.81; 0.71-0.82) were significantly less likely to report assortative mixing than non-U.S. native Hispanic men. Non-Hispanic White men living in the principal city of a MSA (aPR=0.88; 0.82-0.94) were less likely to report assortative mixing than non-Hispanic White men living outside of a MSA. Finally, non-Hispanic black men who lived in a MSA but not a principal city (aPR=0.76; 0.5-0.99) were significantly less likely to report assortative mixing than those living outside of a MSA. Conclusions: Racial/ethnic assortative mixing varied by sex, race/ethnicity, residence in a MSA and U.S. nativity. Further exploration of geographic factors could aid in developing interventions to reduce STI differences through tailored interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cain et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: