Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Between 1976 and 1993, every U.S. state dismantled the marital rape exemption, repricing the legal liability structure of the marital contract in a staggered, plausibly exogenous sequence. We assemble a 107-million-record microdata infrastructure from IPUMS USA (1970-1990 decennial censuses; 2000-2024 American Community Surveys) and a hand-constructed 51-state family legislation matrix to estimate the causal effect of these reforms on marriage market participation. Our primary design is a micro-level linear probability model estimated on 19,775,597 complete-case observations, absorbing state fixed effects, year fixed effects, and state-specific linear trends, with CR1 state-clustered inference (51 clusters, test df = 50). We document a +10.4 percentage point increase in long-run marital stock capitalization following reform adoption (p < 0.001), alongside a +4.2 percentage point short-run effect (p < 0.001). A general-equilibrium framework rationalizes this Elite Sorting Paradox: statutory rights codification converts marriage into a protected asset-pooling vehicle whose scarcity value accrues disproportionately to high-income, high-education cohorts (+11.1 pp education gradient), while unobserved exit costs filter lower-income households out of the entry margin. Placebo and pre-trend diagnostics support the identifying assumptions. Volume I of The New Human Race project.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhenning Cheng (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: