Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
What happens when an intimate emotion becomes acceptable only after another authority decides what it means? This article compares two publisher-authorized passages from Laila Lalami’s The Dream Hotel (2025) and Sierra Greer’s Annie Bot (2024). Sara Hussein is a human woman whose responses to detention are absorbed into the language of administrative risk; Annie is an artificial companion whose responses are judged by the man who owns her. Drawing on Sara Ahmed’s account of the social circulation of emotion, the article defines gendered emotional legibility as a relation of interpretive authority rather than a test of whether a feeling is accurately detected. It identifies two different mechanisms: anticipatory suspicion, in which resistance is converted into grounds for continued restraint, and compulsory responsiveness, in which an artificial companion’s feelings are judged according to their service to an owner. The close readings attend to narrative access, the organization of time, dialogue, and the power to authorize or disregard refusal. The distinction between a carceral risk regime and domestic ownership is essential: these are not interchangeable technologies. Read together, the selected scenes show how the authority to name or discount another’s feeling can become coercive even where that feeling is plainly articulated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahzad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: