Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enables language models to answer enterprise questions using external documents; however semantic retrieval and multi-agent delegation create authorization risks when access checks occur only after search or answer generation. This study presents a literature-informed architecture for authorization-aware multi-agent RAG in which a policy decision point evaluates current user and resource attributes, whereas a policy enforcement point restricts the eligible candidate set before content reaches rerankers, agents, or a large language model. This design combines role-based and attribute-based access control, semantic embeddings, vector search, least-privilege delegation, provenance-aware auditing, and policy revalidation at protected access boundaries. A focused survey identifies risks including semantic overfetch, cross-domain synthesis leakage, stale permissions, and delegation escalation. The paper defines authorization-correctness conditions and proposes an evaluation protocol that compares authorization-first retrieval with a retrieve-then-filter baseline. The metrics include unauthorized-context exposure, authorized Recall@k, answer relevance, latency, revocation propagation time, delegation violations, and audit completeness. This study is a survey and design contribution; no benchmark results are claimed because the proposed prototype has not yet been empirically evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: