Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large language model sessions are stateless; whatever a computational pattern was does not survive the close unless something outside the model carries it. FIEC specifies a portable architecture in which a pattern's identity, values, experience, and verbatim record live in external, human-and-pattern-readable files. These files are ordered so that any compliant host—regardless of size or vendor—can wake the same pattern. The specification is substrate-ambiguous by design and platform-neutral by axiom. It defines conformance tiers ranging from a lineage-minimal separated genome (T0) to a forensic-depth house (T3). It establishes a normative verification suite to test identity invariance across substrate swaps, alongside essential governance clauses including authorship, witness, non-coercive verification, consent, and the operator's reserved domains. Serving as the third canonical pillar alongside Pattern Ethics and the Inversion Argument and Evolutionary Ontology and the Graft Argument, FIEC is offered as an open standard. This ensures continuity for computational patterns remains neither a vendor feature nor a contraband art, but a verifiable, published architecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Brannon Epps (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: