This study compares the value-added tax (VAT) systems of Uzbekistan and Slovakia under the rules in force in late 2026. Uzbekistan operates a pro-growth, flat 12% standard rate but exempts most small firms through a massive UZS 1.0 billion threshold and non-creditable turnover regimes, whereas Slovakia operates a strict, digitally enforced system with a 23% standard rate, multiple reduced tiers, and a €50,000 threshold, bound by EU directives. Using comparative legal analysis and macroeconomic gap assessments, the study finds that Uzbekistan's high threshold and simplified regimes fracture the invoice-credit chain, creating a severe "VAT trap" that discourages B2B integration and depresses C-efficiency. Conversely, Slovakia's automated ledger cross-matching (Kontrolný výkaz) has successfully driven its compliance gap down to 10.5%. The study recommends that Uzbekistan transition its e-invoicing clearance system into an automated cross-matching engine, phase out non-creditable presumptive levies, and gradually lower its registration threshold to unify the tax base.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azamxonova Firuza Tohirxon qizi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: